The independent design expert considers the origin of the concept, design method, visual or spatial language, control of detail and final presentation. Novelty alone is not sufficient: the idea must be developed into a coherent system whose outcome clearly supports the author’s central proposition.

The academic and research expert checks whether the project question is clear, sources are reliable, methods are appropriate and conclusions are logically connected to the design outcome. Work involving cultural, social or public issues must define its context, audience and likely impact rather than relying on surface symbolism.

The industry practice expert evaluates whether a project can move from concept to application within realistic conditions of production, construction, operation, service or digital delivery. Functional integrity, materials, cost, maintenance, safety, user feedback and long-term value are considered.

The Jury Chair verifies juror eligibility and declarations, ensures scores are submitted independently and initiates review when results are anomalous or evidence is uncertain. The Chair may require a procedural remedy or reassignment, but may not change another juror’s score or select a work by personal preference.